The role of economic systems is to manage our resources to produce the goods and services that societies need and to improve human well-being. The economy is a system that is nested inside the larger social system which includes aspects of history, politics, culture, ethics, gender norms, and other human motivations. Economic activities and outcomes are directly affected by these social structures. The social system is also nested inside the natural environment. All social and economic activities require the input of natural resources and generate wastes that are absorbed by the environment. There is no one right way to structure an economy to meet all of society’s needs. In fact, there is likely an infinite number of possible economic systems, each with its own intricacies and complex rules and structures. However, we can broadly categorize these systems into four types based on their characteristics.
Traditional Economic System
Command Economic System
Market Economic System
Mixed Economic System
Fig: Economy, Society, and the Environment
Patterns of ownership:
The differences between private, social, and public ownership of the means of production and their interactions with economic systems must be emphasized. The inputs utilized in manufacturing are referred to as the means of production in economics. These include items like equipment, technology, tools, raw materials, land, and facilities. For instance, the means of production in a sawmill would be the land where the mill is located, the physical structure of the mill, the tools and equipment required to turn the raw materials into lumber and other desired wood products, and the raw materials themselves, which are primarily in the form of timber. A fundamental issue that sets capitalism apart from socialism is who should possess the means of production. Socialists support collective ownership of the means of production, whereas proponents of capitalism favor individual ownership.
When someone has the legal authority to own anything as their own, they are said to be in private ownership. This often indicates that the owner has the authority to decide how much money is made from the property, to charge people to use it, and to forbid others from using it. In the case of the sawmill, its ownership may be assigned to a single individual, a small group of people, or a private organization with a large shareholder base. All of the earnings from the sawmill's output would go to these people, organizations, or entities, and they would also have complete control over the mill's management choices, such as how much to produce, how much to pay employees, and how to spend any profits. '
The means of production can be owned and controlled by the government, by labor unions, or by other forms of cooperative or collective ownership under social ownership. Using the sawmill as an example once more, employees may establish a cooperative in which earnings are shared among all members and management choices are decided upon jointly, perhaps by democratic vote. Large-scale social ownership expansion is a very complicated process.
Socialists have long struggled with how to equitable divide ownership of the means of production and resources among millions or even thousands of individuals. In order to develop social ownership at that level, appropriate mechanisms for social decision-making about resource management must be identified.
Ultimately, the state owns the means of production when they are owned by it. Let's go back to our sawmill example. Since the state owns the sawmill, its employees are state employees, and a state-appointed management committee makes management choices that direct the company toward achieving certain social and/or economic goals. State ownership may be viewed as a kind of social ownership in a functioning democracy, provided that the government acts to represent the interests of everyone in the country.
Traditional Economic System
A traditional economy is a system in which the development and distribution of goods and services are determined by customs, traditions, and time-honored beliefs.
Defining characteristics of traditional economic system:
Fundamental economic choices, such how to produce and distribute products and services, are made in traditional economies based more on social norms and custom than on the possibility of financial gain. Traditional economies rely on agriculture, hunting, fishing, or a mix of these three sources of income, and people trade or barter instead of utilizing money.
The majority of today's free market economies, including the Indian economy, US economy, base their production decisions on consumer demand and price willingness.
The gross domestic product (GDP), which is the market value of all consumer goods and services generated in a specific time period, is typically used to assess the economic health of a country. This is in contrast to conventional economies, where people's actions in the marketplace are dictated by their ties with family and friends rather than by their financial status and desires to purchase goods.
For instance, children reared on farms are more likely to become farmers as adults in a traditional economy. They will trade the commodities they create, like milk or leather, for goods they need, such eggs and vegetables for food, rather of utilizing money. They typically barter with the same people their parents and grandparents had traded with because of rooted family and community relationships.
Traits of Traditional Economies:
Developing second- and third-world countries, particularly those in Africa, Latin America, Asia, and the Middle East, are generally home to rural areas with traditional economies.
A family or tribe is the center of traditional economies. Economic decisions are founded on customs derived from elders' experiences, much like in everyday routines.
Numerous traditional economies are based on hunter-gatherer communities that move seasonally across large distances in pursuit of the herd animals they need to survive.
They seldom trade with them since they all require and produce the same items, and they frequently have to compete with comparable groups for the limited natural resources.
When commerce occurs in primitive economies, barter is used instead of money. Trade only occurs between non-competing organizations.
For instance, a tribe that hunts may exchange part of its meat for vegetables that an agricultural tribe grows.
Economists use the term "completeness" to characterize a conventional economy as one in which every item and service is used.
Traditional economies seldom generate an excess of products; this eliminates the need to trade or create money since they only produce what they need to exist.
When traditional societies settle down and adopt agriculture, they finally start to advance past the hunter-gatherer phase. By farming, people may produce an abundance of crops that they can sell.
This frequently incites communities to invent a medium of exchange to enable commerce across great distances.
Comparing a traditional economy to more prevalent main world economies like capitalism, socialism, and communism might be useful in describing it.
Command Economic system
A dominating, centralized power (often the government) that dominates much of the economic activities is what defines a command economic system. The majority of nations with this kind of economy have socialist or communist political structures. Because there is no free market at work and the majority of production choices are decided by the government, the system is also occasionally referred to as a planned economy.
Command economies are most vulnerable to arise in economies with abundant access to important resources. In such situations, the government intervenes to control the resources and the majority of the activities that surround them (distribution, for example). In reality, the most valuable resources in the economy—such as gold and oil—are often the only ones covered by the centralized control feature. Other aspects, like agriculture, are frequently allowed to be governed by the broader public and other societal sections.
In principle, a command economy may function effectively, provided that the government exercises its authority for the benefit of society. Regretfully, though, this isn't always the case. Furthermore, because command economies are centralized, they are less adaptable than alternative systems and respond to changes more slowly.
Market Economic System
A market economic system, sometimes referred to as capitalism or a market economy, is predicated on free markets and forbids government intervention in the economy. The government has no authority over any resources or other significant economic sectors under this arrangement. Rather, the people manage the entire system, and supply and demand dictate how resources are distributed. As a result, other names for this system are capitalist economy or laissez-faire capitalism.
The idea of the market economy is theoretical. This means that there isn't a single actual instance of a pure market economy. This is because, regardless of how market-oriented they are, every capitalist economy that we are aware of exhibits traits of at least some level of government involvement. Many governments enact legislation, for instance, to control monopolies or to guarantee balanced commerce, social equality, and other issues.
Theoretically, economies with free markets can expand at rapid rates. the highest of the four economic systems, perhaps. Furthermore, capitalism guarantees the separation of the government and the economy. However, a capitalism society also gives highly strong private actors the ability to become socially unequal, especially those who hold important resources. Put another way, society as a whole may not necessarily benefit in the long run from the distribution of wealth and other advantages of a capitalist economy's high economic production.
Mixed Economic System
Any combination of a market economy and a command economy is referred to as a mixed economic system. It's also known as a dual or mixed economy at times. Although
the phrase "mixed economic system" has no specific meaning, it is typically used to refer to free market economies with significant regulation and government control over some sectors (such as public goods and services).
These days, the majority of Western economies—like the Indian and the US economy—are regarded as mixed economies. While a limited number of public utilities and services are still held by the state, the majority of industries within those networks are privately owned. As a result, both the public and private sectors are essential to the health of the economy and cannot sustain it on their own.
These days, mixed economies are frequently seen as the most effective and efficient economic system. The idea behind them is to blend the best aspects of market and command economies. But in reality, it's not often that simple. The degree of governmental control varies widely, and certain governments frequently increase their authority above what is required.
Socialism
The means of production are jointly held by the government or the workforce in a socialist economy. Wage work may be less common in socialism since asset ownership is shared rather than concentrated within a small group. Additionally, values of solidarity and equality may influence economic decisions more than vested interests and financial gain. Socialist philosophy is compatible with public education supported by taxes, universal healthcare, and a host of other welfare initiatives. Governments and other social institutions are heavily involved in economic matters in order to further these socialist principles.
In socialism, decision-making is frequently more centralized than in capitalism, where it is typically more decentralized. When the government owns the means of production, state institutions with particular social and economic goals may play a major role in guiding choices. Decisions by worker organizations or unions through voting or other processes may be made more readily under a society where workers collectively own the means of production. Profits, or avoiding losses, might be a motivating factor for a socialist-structured company.
Nonetheless, as labor security and environmental health and safety have a direct impact on the general well-being of employees and society at large, socialists sometimes contend that a really socialist company is more likely to take these matters into account.
Those in authority have a great deal of ability to impact social and economic results when decision-making is centralized. For instance, the central government can enact laws to force people to cooperate in order to accomplish goals that enhance the welfare of society. Furthermore, since production decisions are based on the value and necessity of different commodities and services, problems of overproduction or underproduction are likely to be avoided if society's requirements are taken into consideration rather than just personal profit motives.
Some of the key features of socialism can thus be summarized as follows: Social or public ownership of the means of production.
Higher levels of central decision-making.
A greater role for egalitarian values in guiding social decisions.
More emphasis on collectivist goals such as equality of opportunity.
A larger role for the government and other social institutions.
Unfortunately, censorship and undemocratic institutions have been commonplace in all nations with planned socialist structures. Single-party rule is the foundation of nearly all nations with centralized state authority, including the former Soviet Union, contemporary Cuba, and North Korea. Many of these nations have a history of repressing dissent. These nations frequently censor critical publications about themselves or their government, occasionally keep an eye on how their citizens use the internet and routinely place low on global indices measuring press freedom. All too frequently, these abuses of authority, restrictions on freedom, and other types of corruption have contributed to the downfall of socialist nations.
Capitalism
Capitalism is an economic system where a small group of people, called capitalists, own and control production. Private property rights are a key part, with the government enforcing laws that acknowledge individuals or companies as owners of their assets. In this system, capitalists get all the profits and make decisions about production.
The main goal in capitalism is to maximize profits, and companies that can't do this well may leave the market. To stay competitive, capitalist businesses focus on developing new and efficient methods, keeping prices low, investing in research for new products, and using branding and advertising to convince people to buy from them.
To stay ahead in the competition, capitalist companies keep using their profits to grow. They do this by increasing their resources, hiring more workers, gaining new knowledge, and expanding their ability to make products. This process of growing and making more money is what fuels the growth and constant changes in a capitalist system. As companies get bigger and better, they might push other competitors out or buy them.
This could lead to a small group of rich capitalists owning most of the resources, unless new companies join the market. In a capitalist system, most people depend on a small group of rich capitalists because they own most of the resources. These individuals are the ones who control access to capital. The majority of workers in this system have only their labor to offer in exchange for wages. So, relying on wages for the majority of the population is another important aspect of capitalism.
We can thus summarize some of the hallmarks of capitalism as follows:
A dominance of private ownership of the means of production
An emphasis on capital accumulation
Predominance of wage labor
An emphasis on decentralized decision-making, largely guided by self-interest and the profit motive
Emphasis on individual freedom and competition over collectivist goals
Markets as the primary means of economic coordination
Too much competition among capitalist companies for the generation of profits can lead to many problems. Companies trying to save money might mistreat workers by paying them very little or giving them unfair conditions. They might also harm the environment by lowering standards or spending too much on misleading advertising, all of which hurt society. Also, the constant push for more production has serious environmental effects because it uses up natural resources and creates waste.
Another problem is the increase in a culture that encourages excessive consumerism due to too much production in capitalist economies.
A capitalist system focused on profit-making often neglects these negative externalities. As decision-making is decentralized, there is nothing that requires individuals to consider how their decisions might affect social outcomes. Hence, high inequality and environmental degradation is often a characteristic of capitalist societies.
Note for UPSC Aspirants: For UPSC aspirants interested in exploring further, here are some keywords to guide your research:economy, social system, economic systems, resources, goods, services, human well-being, history, politics, culture, ethics, gender norms, natural environment, ownership, means of production
Comments